top of page
Search

U.S. schools struggle to cover SPED costs

Mar 3, 2025, Times of India: U.S. schools grapple with the fallout of insufficient federal special education funding 

In 1975, the United States made a defining promise to its most vulnerable students: a free and appropriate public education, enshrined in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). At the core of this pledge was a federal commitment to cover 40% of the cost of special education services. However, five decades later, that promise seems to be little more than an empty declaration. Federal funding has never come close to meeting this benchmark, compelling states and local school systems to fill the gap—often at the cost of both students with disabilities and a holistic education system.


As districts struggle to meet legal obligations with inadequate resources, the consequences are alarming: overcrowded classrooms, dwindling support services, and an education system where students with the greatest needs are often left behind. The question remains—how long will the nation allow its most vulnerable learners to bear the weight of a broken commitment?


A promise unkept


The original intent has taken a backseat, buried beneath stacks of paperwork. Federal funding for special education has never been adequate and has consistently fallen short of the 40% target, according to US media reports. The 2023 report by the National Association of Elementary School Principals (NAESP) found that federal funding came closest to 18% between 2004 and 2006, with current levels dropping to less than 13%.


This massive underfunding has left states and local districts scrambling to cover substantial gaps, often redirecting resources from other critical educational programmes.


Financial strain on local districts


The financial implications of this shortfall are profound. On average, educating a student with disabilities costs approximately 1.9 times more than educating a student without special needs. With federal contributions covering only a fraction of these expenses, local districts are compelled to allocate a significant portion of their budgets to special education. This reallocation often results in reduced funding for general education programmes, larger class sizes, and diminished extracurricular offerings, affecting the quality of education for all students.


States Bearing the Brunt


The shortfall in federal funding has placed immense pressure on state and local education budgets, leading to significant challenges across various states:


Wisconsin: According to a report titled, Underfunding of Special Education Harms All Wisconsin Students School Districts, states were compelled to divert approximately $1.25 billion from general education funds to cover special education costs. High-poverty districts, in particular, had to reallocate about $1,818 per pupil, exacerbating educational inequities.

Idaho: The state faced a $66.5 million deficit in special education funding, impacting the quality of services provided to its most vulnerable students according to media sources.

 

Arizona: The state grappled with a budget shortfall in the Department of Economic Services' Developmental Disabilities Division, affecting services for approximately 60,000 residents.

Impact on teacher recruitment and retention.


The underfunding crisis transcends financial constraints; it directly impacts resources within schools. Districts face immense challenges in recruiting and retaining qualified special education teachers. The surge in workloads, augmented by budget limitations, leads to higher burnout rates among educators. This scarcity not only affects the quality of education provided to students with disabilities but also places additional stress on remaining staff, further deteriorating educational standards.


Consequences for students


For students with disabilities, the repercussions are particularly severe. Insufficient funding means limited access to necessary resources, outdated assistive technologies, and inadequate support services. As a result, these students may not receive the individualized attention and tools they need to thrive academically and socially. Moreover, the strain on general education resources can lead to a less inclusive environment, hindering the integration and acceptance of students with disabilities within the broader student body.


The call for full funding


Education leaders and advocates nationwide are urging the federal government to honour its commitment to special education funding. Achieving the 40% funding target would alleviate financial strain on local districts, enabling them to invest more in both special and general education programmes. This investment is crucial for providing early intervention services, professional development for educators, and access to the latest assistive technologies—ensuring that all students receive a high-quality education tailored to their needs.


Comments


bottom of page